In order for the
families of cancer patients to not have a great deal of financial problems, the
government should give out grants. If the government gives grants to patients
and their families than they would get a great deal of positive feedback from all
Americans. The grants would help pay for treatments and medical expenses as
well as help with personal expenses with family providers who do not have jobs
because they are taking care of the patients. However, some people might object
because they might think that the government should not be wasting any more
money and getting into more debt. Also, people might think that it is lazy for
the family provider not to work and that they should get a job to pay for the
expenses themselves.
Another solution that might help solve the problem is
starting an organization to where people can contribute to help pay for
treatment for people with cancer. The organization could raise money by hosting
events that catch people’s attention and bring awareness to the disease. A
reason to which people might abject this solution is because they might think
that people will not want to spend money on something that has no benefit to
them. Also, they might think that the organization favors some people over
others and that all the money does not go to the patients.
Finally, another solution that might solve the financial
situation of the families is the individuals help. At the end of the day
everyone is human and people should help other individuals without any benefit
to themselves. If every single person in the United States gave a dollar, than
many patients could afford to get treatment and be saved. However, it all goes
back to the people not wanting to waste their own money to help others, which
is the overall objection to these solutions.
The last two solutions here sound similar--in the last one, do you mean providing help to families that people know personally? Would families need to apply for the grants you propose in the first example?
ReplyDelete